Many of you have been wondering about Jonny’s exhortative lawsuit against Omran Peroz of the Great Afghan Kabob restaurant since Mr Peroz’s July 12 reply. Two days later, Jonny filed a 36-page, 300-clause rebuttal. We are sure that once Mr Peroz’slawyers stop laughing, they will prove that Jonny is embodiment of the old English proverb about a man who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client. To be blunt, his July 14 reply looks like he did a couple of Google searches, had his CHATGPT write a few transition lines and then rushed to the courthouse to file it.
The reply can be broken down into several main subject areas, such as Rexy is a
legitimate service dog or the need for the court to expedite his case because there is
so much non-relevant, extraneous material cited (the old bury them-in bullshit grift)
such as citing the 1998 Delwin Vriend sexual orientation lawsuit against the
Government of Alberta (Vriend is gay, not trans).
Rather than depriving our readers of the full experience by summarizing what we think
is relevant, a lie or a hallucination, we have decided to break down Jonny’s reply by
the subject matter, let you read it and decide for yourself. If some of our readers should
happen to be Allard Law students and would care to make a comment or two on the
legal chops of their future classmate, all the better.
First up, claiming that Rexy is a certified and registered service dog.
It seems the only salad Yaniv ever had was CHATbot word salad!
