We could continue to pick apart Jonny’s 300-clause rebuttal to the Great Afghan Kabob restaurants countersuit but will end it today by examining his new identity – that of a scholar of the Holy Koran. To
be honest we are surprised that he did not claim the title of Iman to give his multi-clause (almost 50, clauses 249-295), repetitive, and specious dribble more believability. It takes years of study of both the Koran and the Hadith to provide religious interpretation and guidance. Jonny had what – a five-minute Google search and then whatever his AI told him to cut and paste? It really looks like neither he or his AI understood what they were reading contextually and literally. Makes you wonder if he had this much trouble when he was studying for his Bar Mitzvah?
We really want to know considering the state of his personal hygiene and strata, how he could with a straight face interpret the clauses (265 -267) on cleanliness and then lecture the court and Mr Peroz on them. Jonny seems to be particularly provoked by cleanliness devoting 7 clauses to the subject In particular, clause 275 seems to have really enraged him. His AI has interpreted it as saying that Mr Peroz somehow thought that Jonny was somehow inferior or unclean. Mr Peroz may not. But his AI got it right. We agree with that statement.
So given Jonny’s sudden studies of the Holy Koran has he converted to Islam? Following Islamic rules would certainly make him a better person and covering his face would make things better for all of us.
This a reminder that Jessica Serenity Yaniv Simpson is in court on 4 August at 09:30 am with his fabricated fraudulent lawsuit in yet another attempt to bully the Asian and ethnic minority community of Langley. The only difference is that this time he has found enough balls to attack a man (Can someone check that DFS is okay and hasn’t been molested in anyway).
Oh Jon, it’s finally too late. And you did this to yourself.
YOU DID THIS TO YOURSELF you unimaginable bastard.
If the owner was Catholic would jonny be so fixated on the religious angle? (Yeah I know how deliberate his targeted “medical emergency” grift is).
It seems in all his religious bigotry waffle he’s “forgotten” why he’s filed…it’s gone from “service dog” denial to he’s not a Muslim.
“If the owner was Catholic…” I am Catholic. Please continue your thought to its logical conclusion.
All those male catholic priests. There was a movie made about it. Really good. Who would play JY in our movie here?
Movie was called Spotlight.
I think what Jon tries to proof by saying that Mr Peroz is not a Muslim is that he declined Jon access to his restaurant because hes a Transphobe or out of spite or other reasons that somehow hurt his fee-fee’s
The problem which stands in Jon’s way is that Muslims regard dogs saliva as impure which means that everything a dog licked would need a washing.
So he tries to argue that Mr Peroz is not a Muslim to remove that obstacle.
Now from Mr Peroz point of view i can totally understand not letting Jon and Rexy in his restaurant.
The Restaurant is a Muslim owned business and the chances are high that it attracts other people of the islamic faith, so letting a 600 pound Trans-Larper who self identifies as a Lawyer and his dog into that business could destroy that business because it could scare away the other muslim customers.
And that is imho what Jon tries to do now.
But keep in mind that is just my theory.
I believe he is now at his most dangerous. He is unhinged and is extremely likely to lash out. I hope RCMP are prepared. He should be monitored every single second.
Agreed…..I see a medical or mental emergency in the next 12 hours.
Suicide attempt most likely, more pity points.
DFS is okay and alive
Perfect keep it that way please. I mean okay he isnt liked that much anymore, but that doesnt mean he shouldnt enjoy his life.
Jon has met another Waterloo. This time, it’s going to cost him big bucks.
especially when the owner has access to this blog and ALL of its contents to use at their discretion (pssst. HE HAS THE LINK YANIV YOUR FUCKED LOL)
It’s quite obvious that Omran became a Muslim since he was born to use it to try and gain advantage in the courts at a future date. Turn it up Jon you dick head, just filing these statements makes you look like the bigoted racist that you are, in effect, you’re stating that by following his religious faith and being faithful to God and its principles that it’s a crime to be a Muslim and he’s using it to gain an advantage. Mate you’d need to draw a very long bow to prove that. the court case is tomorrow, prediction, you are going to get excoriated, you will learn that everything you thought you knew about law was incorrect. You will go away from that court with a $35,000 bill and the magistrate will tell you your case has no merit whatsoever and you will be declared a vexatious litigant. Do appeal though, just so you can lose a second time.
It will all go a bit like this-
Omran: Your dog is a registered and fully trained service dog?
Yaniv: Yes
Omran: Do you have the registered papers that proves its a service dog?
Yaniv: No
Omran: Why not?
Yaniv: Because the dog has not been officially trained or tested by the Service Dog Association
Omran: Who trained the dog?
Yaniv: I did.
Omran: So what qualifications do you have to train the dog?
Yaniv: I am a Transgender Muppet.
Omran: So what is the dog actually trained to do?
Yaniv: Set the table, prepare my food, drive me to the Doctors, alert me to when my diabetes is playing up, hump me.
Omran: I see the dog is humping your leg and chewing the computer cables, can you please run through with a complete demonstration of what your dog is trained to do. Start with sit, shake, roll over and stay. Can it do any of that?
Yaniv: No.
Omran: Give the court a full demonstration of what the dog is trained to do.
Yaniv: Crickets!
Then, the judge will announce that all of the references to Omran not being a Muslim be struck from the filing, as it is totally irrelevant. Omran does not have to prove he is a Muslim, you have to prove your dog is a fully trained and registered service dog. Good luck with that.
Wait, is this in Yaniv’s suit against the restaurant, or in the restaurant’s countersuit against Yaniv?
Will there be a pdf of Jon’s hilarious response?
Our Legal Expert responded to Omar Peroz’s counter-claim of damages with volumes of precedents and decisions. The case hasn’t been heard and he thinks past decisions will influence the verdict? Talk about putting the cart before the horse. He doesn’t understand due process, you respond to the verdict and appeal with all those precedents if needed. The Court should just take Yaniv’s word and dismiss the case? He is forever Delusional. Thank you Meow Mix for all the updates and anecdotes.