Jonny is afraid. He is afraid that he will not get a fair trial in a timely fashion. He wants the trial expedited and fully expects the court to acquiesce. Except, Jonny this is the BC court system which, unlike the BC
Health System does not countenance queue jumpers even if they claim to be Metis. He has devoted almost 40 per cent of his reply to this demand.
We surmise it is because he realizes that this case differs from his previous exhortative lawsuit attempts and that he is running out of manoeuvring room and time. Surprisingly, it has little to do with the
Islamophobic and growing community awareness and publicity. In the past, whenever his victims chose to fight back, Jonny would withdraw the action before the trial but after the procedural settlement
conference. If he withdrew before trial, he would not chance losing and be on the hook for costs and penalties. His victims were often out thousands of dollars in lawyers’ fees and costs. This time, his victim chose to not only fight back but to countersue, thereby eliminating the option to withdraw. Jonny has now realized that if he loses, he loses everything, which would explain clause 21, which accuses Mr. Peroz of “perfidious litigation”. From the continuous attempt to educate the court throughout the entire document to questioning the competence of Mr Peroz’s lawyers (clause 32) and the endless repetition of peripheral case law, you can smell his desperation, and we are not just talking about his normal body odour. Any first-year law student knows you meticulously research and then use the best example, not ALL possible examples.
He continuous to attack Mr Peroz claiming in clause 30 that Mr Peroz has failed to substantiate his allegations (not true) and asking for the countersuit to be dismissed to accusing Mr Peroz of forum shopping and harassment (clauses 46-48), also not true, but very true of Jonny’s behaviour. Reading through the clauses, it is hard not to laugh. For example, in clause 14, he asks for the counterclaim to be dismissed because it is vexatious. (He asks for it to be dismissed again in clause 61) or clause 12, where he accuses Mr Peroz of abusing the court process for ulterior motives. Sounds more like Jonny’s legal history since 2016. The absolute laugh out loud moment came in clause 33, where Jonny proclaimed himself to be a dutiful agent of the court’s invaluable resources. You have to wonder how he will reconcile that claim with the fact that at one time, he had close to 100 private lawsuits launched primarily because the local RCMP would not charge people on whom Jonny wanted to be charged. All those applications were rejected when reviewed by the court, which agreed with the RCMP, much to Jonny’s fury.
One interesting take from his verbal diarrhoea is that he is ultra scared that Mr Peroz has any information from us and is demanding the Judge ban any evidence from third parties. This means he also couldn’t rely on Miriam’s evidence when he was out of earshot. You have to love him for self fucking.